Petitions: Read before you sign - statements by petition supporters and the collectors of signatures are sometimes misleading

Here is the short version of this post: A Michigan petition drive is underway to repeal the law that gives the Michigan governor the ability to protect public health and safety during the covid-19 pandemic. Some voters asked to sign the petition have been told that repealing the law will help the governor and small businesses or help hire more police and firefighters. None of this is true. One of the people involved in circulating petitions has a sketchy past involving voter and election fraud.

Read on for the details and political intrigue:

A petition drive is underway in Michigan to repeal a 1945 law granting emergency powers to the Michigan governor. Governor Gretchen Whitmer is using these emergency powers during the Covid-19 pandemic to protect public health and safety, including requiring face masks in enclosed public spaces, and regulating activities that can spread the Covid-19 virus and make it harder to control.

There is fierce opposition to the Governor’s actions, although, in general, governors who have taken strict measure on coronavirus have seen better political outcomes than those who have not. (According to a Washington Post article from 7/31/20 by Amber Phillips, Governor Whitmer has an approval rating of about 64%). Furthermore, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that said that Whitmer had not exceeded her authority under the Emergency Powers Act. The Michigan Supreme Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments on September 2, 2020 on a case challenging her use of executive powers.

According to an article in the on-line magazine Bridge Michigan, “The Michigan Constitution sets signature thresholds for petition drives at 8 percent of the total turnout in the most recent gubernatorial election. While there are 7.7 million registered voters in Michigan, about 4.25 million cast ballots in the 2018 election that Whitmer won by nearly 10 percentage points over Republican Bill Schuette.”

The organization collecting signatures is called Unlock Michigan . It needs to collect to collect at least 340,047 valid signatures within 180 days (by early January 2021), according to Michigan law. “…organizers hope to get the initiative to the Legislature this year while they are still guaranteed a GOP majority in the state House. Passage by the legislature under these circumstances does not allow a veto by the governor.”

If the legislature repeals the 1945 law that gives the governor emergency powers to control the Covid-19 pandemic without legislative approval, is the legislature willing to step up to its responsibility to protect public safety by agreeing to approve emergency measures under a 1976 law that requires legislative approval of the governor’s actions? Who do they fear more? Their supporters who aggressively oppose controls or the pandemic that has ravaged the country for 6 months with over 100,000 cases in Michigan and close to 7,000 deaths?

Petition drives to place an issue on a ballot for a vote are not unusual. The controversy here is about the bait-and-switch tactics of the people hired to collect signatures and questions about the sketchy reputation of the company they work for.

Funding for the “Unlock Michigan” campaign comes mostly from a group with ties to Michigan Senate Republicans

An article in the Detroit News, “Mystery money fuels campaign to limit Whitmer's emergency powers” by Craig Mauger, 7/27/20, looks into funding for "Unlock Michigan".

“The group collecting petitions to limit Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's emergency powers is primarily being funded by a nonprofit that doesn't have to disclose its donors."

…“Michigan Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility, a Lansing-based organization with ties to Senate Republicans, gave $660,200 to Unlock Michigan from June 9 through July 20, according to a new campaign finance report.”

…“Under Michigan law, ballot proposal committees, like Unlock Michigan, can receive money from corporate donors and unions, including nonprofits that raise their funds from elsewhere. The chain of giving effectively conceals the original source of the money.” [Emphasis added]   

…“Unlock Michigan released its first campaign finance disclosure on Monday. Of the $765,024 the group raised through July 20, 86% of the money came from Michigan Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility, which spent about $1.1 million backing GOP Michigan Senate candidates in 2018, according to the Michigan Campaign Finance Network.”

Unlock Michigan hires a firm to circulate petitions that subcontracts to a circulator with a criminal record
 

This is according to an article in the Detroit Free Press, “Unlock Michigan petition circulator has criminal record, history of 'bait and switch' by Paul Egan, 8/28/20:

“The owner of a firm collecting signatures to repeal a law granting emergency powers to Michigan's governor has a criminal record for falsifying his voter registration and a history of alleged ‘bait and switch’ tactics in paid petition drives around the U.S.”

The individual in question is Mark Jacobi, a subcontractor to National Petition Management, the firm Unlock Michigan hired to head up its drive to collect about 500,000 signatures.

“Mark A. Jacoby, 37, whose company, Let the Voters Decide, is publicizing that it will pay petition circulators $3.50 for each valid signature to repeal the Emergency Powers of Governor Act of 1945, was arrested for suspected voter registration fraud and perjury in California and pleaded guilty in 2009 to a lesser charge of registering to vote at an address where he did not live.”

Unlock Michigan disputes the involvement of Jacoby in the collection of signatures, but Jacoby said he is a subcontractor to National Petition Management, the firm Unlock Michigan hired to head up its drive to collect about 500,000 signatures. 


According to the Detroit News [from "Mystery Money"], “As of July 20, Unlock Michigan had paid National Petition Management $300,000 in the relatively early stages of the petition drive, records show." , The Detroit News]

So, think before you sign and make sure you understand what you are signing.

*************************

For more political intrigue from The DD News Blog, read about the 2012 Proposition 4 campaign involving state advocacy groups and fines for campaign finance violations.

Michigan: Election Shenanigans 2020, Part I

It's election season again, and there are various schemes afoot to discourage us from voting or to deceive us in some way so that we aren't thinking straight when we do vote. 

This article in the Detroit Free Press, "Michigan election, legal chiefs decry 'racist' robocall that attacks mail-in voting" by Dave Boucher, 8/27/20, describes a robocall that is going around in Detroit:

 

"The top elections and legal officials in Michigan jointly denounced a robocall making the rounds in Detroit on Thursday, labeling it a racist and inaccurate attempt to dissuade the use of mail-in voting.

 

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Attorney General Dana Nessel said they want to warn residents that other misinformation campaigns are likely to crop up as the Nov. 3 general election draws near. "

Here is a YouTube version of the call.

The call claims that "voters who apply for and use absentee ballots are providing personal information that may be used by police to exercise warrants, credit card companies to collect debts and the CDC to 'track people for mandatory vaccines.'"

None of this is true.

"Don't be (inaudible) into giving your private information to the man. Stay safe, and beware of vote by mail," the robocall states.

"Nationally, President Donald Trump and other Republicans continue to repeat false claims about mail-in voting, arguing the process may lead to a rigged or corrupt election. Experts say vote-by-mail does not give an advantage to either political party and election fraud in any form is incredibly rare." 

According to the Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, it's a felony under Michigan law to deter or otherwise disrupt a person trying to vote. Someone convicted of this offense could face a $1,000 fine and up to five years in prison. 

Anyone who receives a suspected robocall should report that information at www.mi.gov/robocall and email the information to elections@michigan.gov, according to the news release

The President suggested in August that he will send law enforcement to monitor polls, a tactic that is well-known for voter intimidation. It turns out that is illegal, too, so he must have been kidding.

Here are two documents [one & two] on Michigan and Federal Election Day Offenses to consider before voting for the Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020 election.

***********

More voting information ...

What is known and unknown about Covid-19 so far

This post is based on an article from statnews.com, “Seven months later, what we know — and don't know — about Covid-19” by Andrew Joseph,Helen Branswell ,and Elizabeth Cooney, 8/17/2020. This is a newsletter on health related issues. Stat.com also has a subscription newsletter, STAT PLUS, with “Exclusive analysis of biotech, pharma, and the life sciences”

************************ 

According to the article, this is what we know:

Children: Teenagers should not be lumped together with children under 5. Teenagers seem to shed the virus at a similar rate to adults. It is not clear that younger children do this.

However, “A recently published report from a Georgia sleep-away camp shows how quickly the virus can spread among kids. The camp had to be closed within 10 days of starting its orientation for camp staffers, because within days of children arriving, kids and staff started getting sick. (The campers ranged in age from 6 to 19.) The camp did not require campers to wear face masks.”

“…a small proportion of children infected with Covid-19 go on to develop a condition where multiple organs come under attack from their own immune system. Called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children or MIS-C, this condition seems to occur about two to four weeks after Covid-19 infection. Most children who develop this syndrome recover.”

Some settings are safer than others: There is a threshold level of virus that you need to be exposed to in order to become infected.

“Essentially, the closer you are to someone infectious and the longer you’re in contact with them, the more likely you are to contract the virus, which helps explain why so much transmission occurs within households. Being indoors is worse, particularly in rooms without sufficient ventilation; the more air flow, the faster the virus gets diluted. Everyday face coverings reduce the amount of virus projected, but aren’t total blockades.”

People can be contagious before they become sick and some people remain asymptomatic but still shed the virus. People who continue to test positive for the virus after they have been ill, may not be contagious at that point.

Lingering effects of the virus in some people: ‘Long-haulers’ don’t feel like they’ve recovered: 

“Unusually sticky blood can clog vessels on the way to the heart and inside the brain and lungs of infected people, causing heart attacks, strokes, and deadly pulmonary embolisms. There are growing worries that these and other health effects will be long-lasting...”

Vaccine development: “…an extraordinary amount of progress toward Covid-19 vaccines has been made, in record time. …That means vaccination with fully approved vaccines could begin as soon as about a year after the discovery of the new virus. This constitutes a revolution in vaccine development.”

How many have been infected? “There have been 21 million confirmed cases of Covid-19 around the world, and 5.3 million in the United States. Far more people than that have actually had the virus.

“Problems with testing, and its limited availability, have contributed to that gap, as has the fact that some people have such mild or no symptoms that they don’t know they’re infected. But researchers don’t know just how big of a gulf they’re dealing with — how much spread they’ve missed.” 

Mutations occur relatively infrequently compared to other viruses and have been inconsequential so far.

The virus on surfaces (“fomites”) does not seem to play a major role in transmission, but frequent hand washing and cleaning of surfaces is still recommended. 

Reinfection with covid-19: It appears that having the virus gives some immunity to it, but it is not known how long that will last. “Some scientists have theorized that on subsequent infections, immune systems might mount quicker responses to Covid-19, leading to milder infections. If that’s true, the SARS-CoV-2 virus might transition into a less daunting threat over time. But it’s still a big unknown…”“ 

It’s not clear why some people get really sick, and some don’t

**************

Read the full article to see illustrations and links to more information about Covid-19.

Labeling Group Homes as "mini institutions" restricts choice and discourages innovation

This is an article from VOR, a Voice Of Reason, published in the Spring 2020 edition of The VOR Voice .

******************************  

Homes for Life 

By Micki Edelsohn

On a lovely spring day in 1972, I held my youngest son Robert for the first time not knowing that this little baby would change the trajectory of my life. Birth injuries that occurred during that difficult delivery resulted in Robert suffering significant intellectual disabilities. As the extent of these disabilities slowly unfolded, I knew that Robert’s challenges would be different from his older brother and yet my goals for him were the same. Robert would get the best education possible to reach his full potential and someday hold a job, live in his own home and enjoy life in his community.

In 1989 I had a small dream. I would find a way to raise the funds to build a group home where Robert could live with his peers when he completed his schooling. There were a few group homes in Delaware; but my vision of what a group home should look like was quite different! It should be in a beautiful, safe community near all appropriate amenities. When my first group home was completed other families liked what they saw, and the State of Delaware asked for more. My husband Lanny and I then established Homes For Life Foundation and, thanks to the generous and ongoing support of the Delaware community and friends around the country as well as corporations and foundations, we have built and furnished 25 debt free group homes and purchased two condos. Today one hundred and four deserving men and women now have a safe and comfortable place to live and enjoy life. Their intellectual disabilities range from high functioning with drop-in support to high needs with 24/7 awake staff.

It didn’t take long to appreciate that building the homes was the easy part. Finding caring, dedicated and competent staff would turn out to be the difficult part. Ironically in the 1990’s, as I was fundraising and building four-person group homes, the State of Delaware approached The Arc of Delaware requesting that they become a landlord by providing homes for those with IDD. I was a board member of the Arc of Delaware at the time. When the Homes For Life homes began to multiply we recognized that as an all-volunteer non-profit organization with no staff to provide property management, we voted to deed each property to The Arc of Delaware for $1.00. The organizational arrangement was as follows: 

• Homes For Life would build and furnish the homes.
• Homes For Life then deeded the homes to the Arc of Delaware for $1. The Arc became the landlord responsible for upkeep of the homes, including a maintenance reserve fund.
• The State of Delaware contracted with provider agencies to support the residents living in the homes and compensate the agencies according to the acuity of the disability of the residents in the homes.
• The residents in the homes would always have the right to change provider agencies if they felt that their needs were not met.

When the last home was donated in 2009 the value of the homes was approximately 10 million dollars. Each home was HCBS waivered. Little by little I began to understand CMS and the Medicaid system. The Medicaid funds are the “lion’s share” of lifetime support due to the costs of direct care for persons with IDD. Each home is only as good as the Direct Support Professionals and the managers who, despite inadequate wages, make a house a home.

It was during this time, that I met many other Delawareans whose adult family members were longing for a more independent life. I also became acquainted with The Mary Campbell Center in Wilmington, a 55 bed ICF with amazing amenities for those with higher needs and medical complexities. I found others online like VOR members Tamie Hopp and Jill Barker, and I met people from across the country who shared my views that a “one size fits all” solution would not be sustainable.

In 2011, I was appointed to the President’s Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities (PCPID). This position gave me more insight into the way services were being allocated, and the ideological direction the agencies administering DD services were taking. At that time CMS began reviewing and changing HCBS regulations. The Administration on Aging and the Administration on Disabilities were combined into the Administration for Community Living (ACL), taking the focus from the needs of the individual to a determination to support a single service model of “community living.” The push to move people from ICFs was well underway, and now various government agencies were shifting again and urging families to keep their loved ones in the family home as a new “alternative.”

I had to accept the sad reality that not only were ICF’s no longer being presented as an option by most states’ departments of disability services, but HCBS waiver models were also being deemed congregate, even 4 person homes. By 2010 our Delaware DDS director was no longer requesting the group home model from Homes For Life. Our group homes were now referred to as “mini-institutions.”

So today, as Robert turns 48, I am no longer a “home builder” but an activist working to ensure that all voices are heard and all housing and work opportunities are valued and receive the funding streams needed to meet all people with IDD, especially those with the highest needs. Those with IDD, regardless of severity, have the right to choose where and with whom they would like to live whether it be in an ICF, a group home, an intentional community, an apartment, a farmstead or in their own home with their family members.

When I first started this journey, I never imagined where it would take me or what wonderful people I would meet along the way. For me, life’s great irony is learning that, although we start out by simply wanting to care and provide for our own very special children, we discover that to do so we must embrace every child.

Michigan groups sue to "Stop the Hamster Wheel" - Medicaid hearings that are never resolved due to lack of adequate funding

A press release from three legal advocacy groups, Including Michigan Protection and Advocacy Services (MPAS), alleges "Systematic Due Process Violations in Michigan Medicaid Program":

...Lansing, MI – Medicaid recipients have long had rights to “fair hearings” to challenge actions affecting their benefits. According to a new lawsuit, however, recipients in Michigan cannot get relief from those hearings, even when they win.

The suit, filed by attorneys for Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. (MPAS), the National Center for Law and Economic Justice (NCLEJ) and Legal Services of South Central Michigan (LSSCM), says that the administrative law judges (ALJs) presiding over fair hearings lack the power to order the agency to grant the benefits it had wrongfully denied. All they can do is send the case back to the agency to “reassess” the recipient. And when the agency comes back with the same decision on reassessment—as it often does—all the recipient can do is ask for another fair hearing, where the same thing will happen again. This is the Michigan Medicaid “Hamster Wheel”: recipients run and they run and they run, but they never get anywhere.

Named Plaintiff Kevin Wiesner lives with various disabilities, and he relies on Medicaid-funded community living supports (CLS) to stay in the community. In 2019, he challenged the CLS budget provided by Washtenaw County Community Mental Health (WCCMH), and the ALJ held in his favor in every respect: The budget was insufficient to meet Kevin’s medical needs, it had been insufficient since at least 2015, and at least a certain, specific amount was required to make it sufficient. But the ALJ did not—because he said he could not—order a budget of that amount. Instead, he told WCCMH to “reassess” Mr. Wiesner’s needs. To no one’s surprise, WCCMH’s “reassessment” ignored the ALJ’s determination and denied Mr. Wiesner any increase at all.

“For more than 50 years, the Constitution and federal statutes have guaranteed public benefit recipients the right to an impartial determination of their benefits,” said Ed Krugman, a senior attorney at NCLEJ, “The Michigan Hamster Wheel makes a mockery of that right. Kevin Wiesner fought for the services he needs, and he won, but he got precisely nothing. That is a travesty.”

“The Medicaid Fair Hearing System is supposed to give recipients the right to challenge actions that negatively affect their benefits,” said Kyle Williams, legal director for MPAS. “If administrative law judges are only allowed to order reassessments, they can never win those challenges, because the reassessment decision is ultimately in the hands of the agency that took the negative action in the first place.”

Nick Gable, attorney for LSSCM, offered a similar thought. “The Medicaid fair hearing “Hamster Wheel” has been a problem for years, to the point that appeals challenging personal care or home and community-based support services denials are rendered futile. A legal challenge to the Hamster Wheel is overdue.”

The suit names WCCMH, Community Mental Health Partnership of Southeast Michigan, their directors, and Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Director Robert Gordon as defendants. The requested relief seeks to end the practice of ALJs remanding cases without ordering specific relief for Medicaid recipients.

Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Inc. (MPAS) is the independent, private, nonprofit organization designated by the governor of the State of Michigan to advocate and protect the legal rights of people with disabilities in Michigan.
www.mpas.org

Since 1965, the National Center for Law and Economic Justice (NCLEJ) has worked with low-income families, individuals, communities, and a wide range of organizations to advance the cause of economic justice through litigation, policy work, and support of grassroots organizing around the country.
www.nclej.org

Legal Services of South Central Michigan provides free legal advice and representation to low-income individuals, families, and older adults.
www.lsscm.org

###

For more information, contact:

Mark McWilliams
mmcwilliams@mpas.org

or Edward P. Krugman

krugman@nclej.org

Kerry Kafafian [kerrykafafian@gmail.com ], Kevin's mom, is also willing to provide more information about the lawsuit.

Troubled times: law enforcement, severe mental illness, and other disabilities

Susan Werner - Did Trouble Me on YouTube

As we experience the Covid-19 pandemic, political unrest, and economic uncertainty, we frequently hear the expression “During these troubled times…” or something equivalent. Whether it is used in an ad for anti-anxiety medication or to promote a candidate in a seemingly distant election, many people with severe mental illness and those with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and their families experience “troubled times” as the norm. Untroubled times are a welcome relief, while waiting for troubles that may be just around the corner. 

In the recent Black Lives Matter upheavals following the horrific video-recorded killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, a demand to “Defund the Police” has been pushed to the forefront of news coverage. There are varying interpretations of what this means. However one interprets the phrase, there is a lot to be gained from examining the role of law enforcement in the lives of people with mental illness and other disabilities, the allocation of taxpayer funds in this regard, and whether there are more effective ways to use the money that might produce better results for everyone concerned. Police departments, like public schools, are often called on to solve societal problems that they have no control over, such as poverty, the lack of medical and mental health care, and homelessness. The neglect of these problems through years of de-funding programs that might have shored-up our system of care and services to people with with mental illness and intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), has led to law enforcement taking on responsibility for problems where others have failed to have an impact. It is hard to believe that most police officers want this responsibility, nor are they very good at solving these types of societal problems.

Severe mental illness often leads to police involvement when a person with untreated mental illness is perceived as acting irrationally or in a threatening manner toward others. People with severe IDD and their families experience similar situations to that of people with severe mental illness and their families. [See "Michigan’s mental health system is failing many with severe autism", 5/16/19 from The DD News Blog for some examples.]

The Treatment Advocacy Center (“Eliminating barriers to the Treatment of Mental Illness”), distributes a Research Weekly that recently looked at the “Role of Law Enforcement in Mental Illness Crisis Response". Its recommendations show how shifting funding from law enforcement to better care and treatment for people with severe mental illness would relieve law enforcement of taking on responsibilities better left to the mental health system and divert people who are unnecessarily forced into the criminal justice system into more appropriate and effective treatment.

Here are excerpts from from the Research Weekly: "Role of Law Enforcement in Mental Illness Crisis Response":
“The Treatment Advocacy Center has been calling attention to the need to transform law enforcement’s role in communities for more than 20 years, starting with the work of our founder Dr. E. Fuller Torrey. Our research expertise includes the role of law enforcement in mental illness crisis response and how people with severe mental illness are overrepresented in the criminal justice system.

"What follows is a compilation of data and information on these important topics: ..”
...
"Approximately one in four fatal police encounters involve an individual with severe mental illness, according to our 2015 report, Overlooked in the Undercounted. This means that people with mental illness are 16 times more likely to be shot and killed by police, compared to people without mental illness. Reducing the disproportionate volume of contacts between law enforcement officers and people with severe mental illness is the single most immediate, practical strategy to reduce fatal police encounters for individuals with mental illness. Furthermore, there is currently no national government database collecting information regarding arrest-related deaths, let alone the role of mental illness or race disparities in these encounters."

...
"The role of law enforcement in mental illness crisis response is an enormous portion of department resources and budgets. Responding to and transporting individuals with mental illness occupies more than one-fifth of law enforcement officers’ time, according to our 2019 report, Road Runners . This outsized role is a result of the overrepresentation of people with mental illness within the criminal justice system, the length of time mental health crisis service calls take, the long distances law enforcement must travel to find available mental health resources and the time officers must wait while transporting individuals in crisis to an emergency department."

...

"The lack of appropriate mental health treatment services in the community was the most prominent factor contributing to law enforcements’ outsized role in mental health crisis response, according to a thematic qualitative analysis of our 2019 law enforcement department survey results . Survey respondents felt that many of the time and resource issues surrounding psychiatric transports are due to an inadequate supply of beds in the community for individuals to receive treatment. As with any other illness, severe psychiatric diseases have a variable illness course, with waxing and waning symptomology and resulting needs for the individual suffering. Therefore, a full continuum of psychiatric care, including outpatient, crisis, and acute care, as well as longer-term and residential-type beds, is needed for a functioning psychiatric system. Few communities in the United States have such a robust mental health care system in place."
...

"As municipalities continue to examine the role law enforcement plays in our society, these data and resources can serve to inform evidence-based policy decisions.

Elizabeth Sinclair Hancq
Director of Research
Treatment Advocacy Center

Michigan Update on Covid-19 Policies and More...

The ARC Michigan is the largest organization in the state advocating for people with developmental disabilities. As the parent of two sons with profound intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), I often disagree with the policies the organization has promoted over the years that ignore the real-life consequences of severe disabilities on the individual and his or her family. Along with many other disability advocacy organizations, the Arc attempts to promote public acceptance of disabled individuals by painting a rosy and unrealistic picture of life with a disability and applies it to all who fall under that category. I do give them credit, however, for making available information that individuals and families need to participate in effecting change in government policies.

The ARC Michigan e-newsletter update has timely information on legislation, other state and national policies, and recent court decisions affecting people with IDD. The archives for the newsletter are available on the website. You can also sign up to receive the newsletter by e-mail.
 
This is from the May 29, 2020, Government Affairs Update from RWC Advocacy, A Governmental Affairs Law Firm in Lansing, Michigan:

Emergency Authorities & COVID-related Legislation

The Michigan House of Representatives has yet to take action on Senate Bill 690, which provides $523 million in supplemental appropriations for Fiscal Year 2020 from the federal coronavirus relief fund for various purposes, most notable of which is the inclusion of a $3/hour increase for direct care worker wages. [emphasis added] We can likely expect the supplemental to move the first week of June.

[This appears on page 11 of the bill: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Section 451. (1) From the funds appropriated in part 1 for pay enhancement for direct care workers, the department of health and human services shall provide sufficient funding to increase the wages paid to direct care workers described in subsection (2) by $3.00 per hour above the rates paid on March 1, 2020 retroactive to April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020.
(2) The direct care wage increase shall be provided to direct care workers employed by the department of health and human services, its contractors, and its subcontractors who received a state-funded wage increase in April 2020. The total combined increase from the April 2020 wage increase and the wage increase outlined in this section shall be $3.00 per hour and shall be in effect from April 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020.
(3) A direct care wage increase of $3.00 per hour shall be provided to direct care workers employed by skilled nursing facilities, retroactive to April 1, 2020 and shall continue until September 30, 2020.
(4) Contractors and subcontractors receiving funding to support these pay enhancements shall be required to provide documentation of the wage increases provided pursuant to this section to the department of health and human services.
(5) Any payment enhancement above the hourly rate in effect on March 1, 2020 shall be of no effect in determining any employee's average compensation as provided by any contract or other provision of law...]
 
[The bill is 18 pages long and contains funding information on many other departments of state government. To find out more, read the bill.]
 
Stay Home, Stay Safe 

On Thursday, May 21, Governor Whitmer announced that she signed another iteration of the Stay Home, Stay Safe order – Executive Order 2020-96 – reaffirming the measures set forth in the previous order but taking the following new actions:

• Repeal of Executive Orders 2020-17 and 2020-34, which imposed a prohibition on elective dental, medical and veterinary services statewide, beginning on Friday, May 29 at 12:01 a.m.

• Allowing statewide reopening of auto showrooms, by appointment only, on Tuesday, May 26.

• Allowing statewide retail, by appointment only, starting on Tuesday, May 26. Stores will be limited to 10 customers at any one time.

• Allowing statewide gatherings of 10 people or less are allowed, but necessary health and safety measures should be used.
...

...Executive Authority Lawsuit
 
Judge Cynthia Stevens issued a ruling in the Michigan Court of Claims on Thursday, May 21 in Michigan House v. Whitmer upholding the Governor’s authority to declare a state of emergency under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act of 1945. However, the judge also ruled that the Governor could not declare a state of emergency and disaster declaration under the Emergency Management Act of 1975 without legislative intervention.
 
[The Governor also has authority under the Emergency Powers of Governor Act of 1945 that does not require the intervention of the legislature.]

See more about Medicaid funding and the legislative attempt to direct funds from recent federal legislation to help the state get through the financial disaster that the corona virus has created.