A little hope for the New Year: Michigan legislature and the Governor agree to $465M in COVID relief

From the Associated Press, 12/19/2020:

Michigan lawmakers, Whitmer agree to $465M in virus aid

"LANSING — Michigan lawmakers and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer agreed to a $465 million pandemic spending plan, including relief payments to businesses and workers struggling to stay afloat because of the coronavirus and government restrictions to curb its spread.

"The legislation received overwhelming Senate support late Friday and is expected to win House passage on Monday before legislators adjourn for the year. Nearly half of the funding would be used to continue, through March, a maximum 26 weeks of unemployment benefits in a year instead of 20 weeks."

A Federal stimulus bill also appears to be headed for approval. Whether this is enough to help ordinary citizens survive the impending economic fallout from the COVID pandemic, at least it is not nothing.

The State bi-partisan agreement includes:

• $220 million to extend, not expand, unemployment benefits through March.
• $100 million in hazard pay for frontline workers helping to fight COVID-19. That's extending a $2 per hour raise offered earlier this year through the end of February.
• $79.1 million for the administration and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.$63.5 million for a “small business survival grant program.”
• $45 million in direct aid for people who lost their job or were furloughed because of the pandemic. Eligible Michigan residents can receive up to 
• $1,650 through this fund.$22.55 million for testing of vulnerable communities, such as nursing homes or other long-term care facilities.
• $3.5 million for local concert venues.
  

Weighing the risks and benefits of newly available Covid-19 vaccines

A Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory Panel has recommended an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Final approval by the FDA could come within days. [See “F.D.A. Advisory Panel Gives Green Light to Pfizer Vaccine” by Katie Thomas, Noah Welland, and Sharon LaFraniere, New York Times, 12/10/10]: 

“The initial shipment of 6.4 million doses will leave warehouses within 24 hours of being cleared by the F.D.A., according to federal officials. About half of those doses will be sent across the country, and the other half will be reserved for the initial recipients to receive their second dose about three weeks later. “

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) has a Website for “COVID-19 Vaccine Provider Guidance and Educational Resources” with the following statement:

“This webpage will house materials to support COVID-19 Vaccine Providers in successful implementation of the COVID-19 Vaccination Program. Be sure to ‘bookmark’ this page and check back frequently for updates!”

This document, “COVID-19 Vaccine Information for Providers,” gives details for how the vaccine program will be administered including billing codes and other requirements that may not be of general interest, but it does have some relevant information for people needing a vaccine.

According to the MDHHS vaccine provider document, 

“The EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] authority allows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to authorize either (a) the use of an unapproved medical product (e.g., drug, vaccine, or diagnostic device) or (b) the unapproved use of an approved medical product during an emergency based on certain criteria. The EUA will outline how the COVID-19 vaccine should be used and any conditions that must be met as requirements of authorized use. FDA will coordinate with CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] to confirm these ‘conditions of authorization.’ Additional information on EUAs, including guidance and frequently asked questions, is located on the FDA website.”

There is more information on the CDC Communications Website: 

“Looking for information on ensuring safety of COVID-19 vaccine, how CDC is making recommendations, FAQs and more? Visit CDC’s new website featuring information on COVID-19 vaccine..."

PRIORITY GROUPS for Vaccination from the MDHHS Website

The phases distributing the vaccine are outlined below, according to the CDC Playbook and most recent ACIP meeting (11/23/2020).

PHASE 1: Potentially limited supply of COVID-19 vaccine doses available - Concentrate efforts on reaching the initial populations of focus for COVID-19 vaccination. The interim subsets for phase 1 are as follows: 

Phase 1-A:

• Healthcare personnel: Paid and unpaid persons serving in healthcare settings who have the potential for direct or indirect exposure to patients or infectious materials…
• Long-Term Care Facility Residents: Residents of skilled nursing facilities and/or assisted living facilities, homes for the aged, adult foster care, etc

Phase 1-B: 

Essential Workers: People who play a key role in keeping essential functions of society running and cannot socially distance in the workplace (e.g., Education Sector, Food & Agriculture, Utilities, Police, Firefighters, Corrections Officers, Transportation)…

Phase 1-C:

High-Risk Adults: Adults with high-risk medical conditions who possess risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness

Adults 65 years of age or older

PHASE 2: Large number of vaccine doses available: Focus on ensuring access to vaccine for all critical populations who were not vaccinated in Phase 1, as well as for the general population; expand provider network.

PHASE 3: Sufficient supply of vaccine doses for entire population (surplus of doses): Focus on ensuring equitable vaccination access across the entire population. Monitor vaccine uptake and coverage; reassess strategy to increase uptake in populations or communities with low coverage.

*********** 

There is also information in the MDHHS document referring to the Moderna vaccine that may be available soon. Keep in mind that different versions of a vaccine will be available and there may be different recommendations for who should take these vaccines and varying side effects.

We are looking at over 3,000 deaths per day nationally from Covid-19 and a persistent resistance by a significant minority of the population to even acknowledge that the virus exists. I have friends who have had the virus and have survived, but say it is one of the worst experiences they have had. They continue to have lingering effects. I also know others who are critically ill during this current surge of cases. My husband’s second cousin recently died of the disease. Most cases of Covid are asymptomatic or relatively mild. That, along with how contagious the disease is and the fact that it can be transmitted before an infected person even knows they have it, make it especially difficult to contain its spread.

A vaccine is crucial to achieving control over the virus, but there is no federal mandate for anyone to take it. Private businesses, schools, hospitals, etc., may eventually require vaccination for employment or participation, but it is highly unlikely that this will happen with vaccines approved under an emergency authorization. [See "Yes, some Americans may be required to get a COVID-19 vaccine but not by the federal government" by Grace Hauck, USA Today, 12/06/20]

***********************

See also:

"Are there side effects to a COVID-19 vaccine? What are the 'ingredients'? The cost? Answers to your vaccine questions" by Adrianna Rodriguez and Grace Hauck, USA TODAY,12/02/20

"Side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine means 'your body responded the way it's supposed to,' experts say" by Adrianna Rodriguez, USA TODAY, 12/07/20

"Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA in their COVID-19 vaccines. This never-before-used technology could transform how science fights diseases." by Karen Weintraub,USA TODAY, 11/23/20

"Britain warns against Pfizer vaccine for people with history of ‘significant’ allergic reactions" by William Booth and Erin Cunningham, The Washington Post, 12/09/20

Michigan Direct Care Workers for People with Disabilities are Facing a Cut in Pay

Michigan Direct Care workers were given a pittance of a wage increase of $2 per hour to continue providing care to people with developmental and other disabilities during the Covid Pandemic. It helped, but now direct care workers will be losing even that if the state does not move to fund these workers.

An opinion piece from Bridge Michigan, “Michigan direct care workers, families headed for choppy waters” by Robert Stein, Todd Culver, and Robert White, 12/02/20, warns of what lies ahead if state government does nothing to prevent this undermining of an already fragile system of care for people with disabilities.

Robert Stein is general counsel of the Michigan Assisted Living Association, Todd Culver is CEO of Incompass Michigan and Robert White is a parent advocate.

Here are some excerpts:

"Many people are approaching the end of 2020 with a sense of relief and hope for a better new year. But for those Michigan families who care for someone with a mental illness or developmental disability, Jan. 1, 2021 is a day fraught with dread.

"That’s the date Michigan’s budget will no longer provide its $2 hourly pay increase for the direct care workers these families rely upon. As a result, they may lose the help and support they need to manage their busy households, continue their employment and ensure the best possible help for their loved ones." 

Last Spring, “more than $100 million in federal funds was matched by a generous $40 million in state appropriations to ensure ongoing direct care worker support.” 

“…The work our state’s direct care workers do is arduous, important and noble, and their positive impact is widespread, with over one million Michiganders relying upon the support direct care workers provide.“

If nothing happens, direct care workers will receive a cut in pay. 

“This will exacerbate Michigan’s direct care worker shortage. Current turnover in the field already is a staggering 37 percent and growing. Meanwhile, demand for the services these workers provide has never been higher. The COVID-19 pandemic and all the stress and uncertainty it has produced has undoubtedly strained the collective mental health of Michiganders, and families throughout the state are struggling to deal with the fallout.“

...“Direct care worker salaries are tied to state Medicaid funding, which, at present, are exceedingly low. Today’s workers currently receive, on average, a starting wage of $10.70 per hour, with many receiving minimal or no additional health or other benefits. When one considers that the average starting wage at a retail outlet or a fast-food restaurant is typically anywhere from $11 to $14 per hour, it’s clear to see that we can and must do better for Michigan’s direct care workforce. “

As we know, COVID-19 has not gone away and neither has the burden on people with disabilities, their families, and direct care workers to maintain some sense of normality and hope for the future. Direct care workers’ wages “…should continue to reflect the extraordinary responsibility they bear. “ 

“We urge state policy leaders to act before the end of the year to continue the funding needed to extend the $2 per hour as a permanent increase through 2021 to ensure the well-being of everyone.”

************************

This is a good time to figure out who your state legislators are, if you do not already know, and keep those contacts available for the year ahead. You may get to know individual aides who work for legislators and the governor and have an easier time of getting your message across.

Here are some useful contacts:

Contact the Governor 

Find your state representative

Find your state senator

 Update from a FaceBook comment: "The gov's office submitted a supplemental budget request on 12/3, one of the items is an extension of the $2/hr increase through March 31. Still a drip-drip-drip approach, but better than cutting it at the end of the month."

2020 Election Results by the Numbers and the Foofaraw in Detroit

Election results by the numbers

National election results as of 12/2/20:  

Joe Biden has won the presidential election with 306 electoral votes (270 needed to win). Trump lost with 232 electoral votes. 

Georgia has gone through its third recount with Biden still winning and no substantial changes over the other recounts.

Popular vote, as of 12 02 20: Biden with 81,009,468 votes or 51.3% to 74,111,419 or 47% for Trump

In Michigan, Biden won 2,804,040 or 50.6% of the vote to Trump’s 2,649,852 or 47.8% of the vote.

The Democrat Gary Peters won a second term in the U.S. Senate with 2,734,568 votes or 49.9% to 2,642,233 or 48.2% votes for the Republican John James.

For more election results, see your local county or state election Website or check out Ballotpedia, an online encyclopedia of American Politics.

Without credible evidence, the Democrats in Michigan have been accused of stealing the election for Biden with fraudulent mail-in or absentee ballots. Using the same allegedly fraudulent ballots, however, the Democrats were not clever enough to steal the state House of Representatives that remains in Republican control. 

Nationally, the Trump appointed Attorney General William Barr declared on 12/1/20 that the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.

President Trump declared months ago, before a single vote was cast, that if he lost the election, it would be because it was “rigged”. Without evidence, he complained that allowing voters to use Mail-in or absentee ballots would result in massive fraud. That’s his story and he's sticking to it. 

Despite losing the election, Trump and the Republican Party have raised over $170 million on claims of election fraud, but the funds can be used for far more than legal challenges to elections. They can ultimately be used to pay down campaign debt, to launch a new political action committee, and to cover the personal expenses of Trump and his family.  [see “Trump campaign, GOP raised at least $170 million since Election Day pushing baseless election fraud claims” by Will Steakin and Soo Rin Kim, 12/1/20 from ABC News] 

One of the false claims made by the President regarding the election in Michigan, was that Michigan instituted universal mail-in voting "right in the middle of an election year." As some of you may recall, Republican and Democratic voters overwhelmingly approved changes to the state constitution that expanded absentee voting in 2018. 

Despite the foofaraw over alleged election fraud at the TCF center in Detroit where absentee ballots were counted, no credible evidence of massive fraud has been found throughout numerous court challenges. Problems with vote counting in Detroit were mostly clerical errors and fewer than 500 votes were ever in question, nowhere near enough to change the results of the election. [see The DD News Blog, "2020 election misinformation and disinformation…"] The situation there became chaotic when Trump began losing his lead in Michigan to Biden. A call went out to Trump supporters to flood the TCF center. It was perfectly predictable that more Biden votes were counted later than same-day election results. Democrats had been encouraged for months to vote by mail-in or absentee ballots and Republicans were urged to vote in-person on Election Day. Absentee ballots took longer to count because they had to be handled and processed without much lead time to have been counted more quickly.

This article from Politico,"The Inside Story of Michigan’s Fake Voter Fraud Scandal" by Tim Alberta,11/24/2020, is a good summary of how Michigan became the center of national attention following the election and unsuccessful legal challenges to overthrow the results of the presidential election. 

Most memorable was a statement by Aaron Van Langevelde, a Republican member of the State Board of Canvassers, made before it was clear that the Board was going to certify the vote that had already been certified locally in all of Michigan’s 83 counties: 

“'We must not attempt to exercise power we simply don’t have,' declared Van Langevelde, a member of Michigan’s board of state canvassers, the ministerial body with sole authority to make official Joe Biden’s victory over Trump. 'As John Adams once said, 'We are a government of laws, not men.' This board needs to adhere to that principle here today. This board must do its part to uphold the rule of law and comply with our legal duty to certify this election.'"

I am personally tired of the drama and want this thing to be over, but I suppose it is not up to me.

*************

By the way, here is what real voter fraud looks like:

"Florida attorney under investigation for registering to vote in Georgia, encouraging others to do the same" by Nicole Carr, WSB-TV, 12/2/20

See more on responses to Michigan legal challenges:

"State elections director knocks down Trump claims about TCF, fraudulent vote count" by Todd Spangler, Detroit Free Press,12/03/ 20

COVID Disinformation: The Anatomy of a Rumor

USA Today routinely fact checks statements made by the media to sort out fact from fiction and information from disinformation. These articles always include references to sources so that you can investigate further and determine the reliability of your own sources of information.

In this Fact Check article, “COVID-19 vaccine recommendations don't link government aid to immunization” by Brinley Hineman, 11/22/20, the reporter tracks down the sources of a false rumor spread on Instagram to discredit the Biden administration’s Corona virus task force. It claims falsely that the Biden Administration will withhold food stamps and other assistance from people who refuse to be vaccinated.

“A screenshot of a Distributed News article posted on Instagram last week wrongly claims that a member of Biden's recently assembled task force recommended withholding food stamps and aid from those who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it's available.

“The post was shared on Instagram by Angela Stanton-King, who was released from federal prison after being pardoned by President Donald Trump in February after she gave birth while incarcerated.

“She ran for Congress as a Republican in the late-Rep. John Lewis' district in Georgia and was defeated by Georgia Democratic Party Chair Nikema Williams. Stanton-King calls herself a criminal justice expert and is a former reality television star.” 

According to the article, the Website Distributed News routinely publishes false information: “The website's post incorrectly says that Dr. Luciana Borio, an infectious disease doctor who is part of Biden's task force, wants to bar people who refuse the vaccine from receiving food stamps and rent assistant.”

The Website falsely states that Dr. Borio is a CIA-linked operative. It sites a paper by a task force unaffiliated with the Biden campaign of which Borio was a member. The task force wrote a report that recommends partnering with organizations already offering services to vulnerable populations to “…to build trust and streamline vaccine provision…” 

“The paper doesn't mention withholding needed aid at all. “

Be prepared for more of this in the weeks to come.

************************

Read more: Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris outline their approach to curbing the pandemic on Biden's website.
.

Scientific Brief from the CDC on using masks to control the spread of the Covid-19 virus

 From the Website of the Centers for Disease Control, 11/10/20

Scientific Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2
Updated Nov. 10, 2020

The brief includes 45 references to substantiate the CDC claims about wearing masks. Link to the Website to see the complete article with references. Here is the brief:

Background

SARS-CoV-2 infection is transmitted predominately by respiratory droplets generated when people cough, sneeze, sing, talk, or breathe. CDC recommends community use of masks, specifically non-valved multi-layer cloth masks, to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Masks are primarily intended to reduce the emission of virus-laden droplets (“source control”), which is especially relevant for asymptomatic or presymptomatic infected wearers who feel well and may be unaware of their infectiousness to others, and who are estimated to account for more than 50% of transmissions.1,2 [emphasis added] Masks also help reduce inhalation of these droplets by the wearer (“filtration for personal protection”). The community benefit of masking for SARS-CoV-2 control is due to the combination of these effects; individual prevention benefit increases with increasing numbers of people using masks consistently and correctly.

Source Control to Block Exhaled Virus 

Multi-layer cloth masks block release of exhaled respiratory particles into the environment,3-6 along with the microorganisms these particles carry.7,8 Cloth masks not only effectively block most large droplets (i.e., 20-30 microns and larger)9 but they can also block the exhalation of fine droplets and particles (also often referred to as aerosols) smaller than 10 microns ;3,5 which increase in number with the volume of speech10-12 and specific types of phonation.13 Multi-layer cloth masks can both block up to 50-70% of these fine droplets and particles3,14 and limit the forward spread of those that are not captured.5,6,15,16 Upwards of 80% blockage has been achieved in human experiments that have measured blocking of all respiratory droplets,4 with cloth masks in some studies performing on par with surgical masks as barriers for source control.3,9,14

Filtration for Personal Protection 

Studies demonstrate that cloth mask materials can also reduce wearers’ exposure to infectious droplets through filtration, including filtration of fine droplets and particles less than 10 microns. The relative filtration effectiveness of various masks has varied widely across studies, in large part due to variation in experimental design and particle sizes analyzed. Multiple layers of cloth with higher thread counts have demonstrated superior performance compared to single layers of cloth with lower thread counts, in some cases filtering nearly 50% of fine particles less than 1 micron.14,17-29 Some materials (e.g., polypropylene) may enhance filtering effectiveness by generating triboelectric charge (a form of static electricity) that enhances capture of charged particles18,30 while others (e.g., silk) may help repel moist droplets31 and reduce fabric wetting and thus maintain breathability and comfort.

Human Studies of Masking and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission 

Data regarding the “real-world” effectiveness of community masking are limited to observational and epidemiological studies.

• An investigation of a high-exposure event, in which 2 symptomatically ill hair stylists interacted for an average of 15 minutes with each of 139 clients during an 8-day period, found that none of the 67 clients who subsequently consented to an interview and testing developed infection. The stylists and all clients universally wore masks in the salon as required by local ordinance and company policy at the time.32
• In a study of 124 Beijing households with > 1 laboratory-confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mask use by the index patient and family contacts before the index patient developed symptoms reduced secondary transmission within the households by 79%.33
• A retrospective case-control study from Thailand documented that, among more than 1,000 persons interviewed as part of contact tracing investigations, those who reported having always worn a mask during high-risk exposures experienced a greater than 70% reduced risk of acquiring infection compared with persons who did not wear masks under these circumstances.34
• A study of an outbreak aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, an environment notable for congregate living quarters and close working environments, found that use of face coverings on-board was associated with a 70% reduced risk.35
• Investigations involving infected passengers aboard flights longer than 10 hours strongly suggest that masking prevented in-flight transmissions, as demonstrated by the absence of infection developing in other passengers and crew in the 14 days following exposure.36,37

Seven studies have confirmed the benefit of universal masking in community level analyses: in a unified hospital system,38 a German city,39 a U.S. state,40 a panel of 15 U.S. states and Washington, D.C.,41,42 as well as both Canada43 and the U.S.44 nationally. Each analysis demonstrated that, following directives from organizational and political leadership for universal masking, new infections fell significantly. Two of these studies42,44 and an additional analysis of data from 200 countries that included the U.S.45 also demonstrated reductions in mortality. An economic analysis using U.S. data found that, given these effects, increasing universal masking by 15% could prevent the need for lockdowns and reduce associated losses of up to $1 trillion or about 5% of gross domestic product.42  [emphasis added]

Conclusions 

Experimental and epidemiological data support community masking to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The prevention benefit of masking is derived from the combination of source control and personal protection for the mask wearer. The relationship between source control and personal protection is likely complementary and possibly synergistic14, so that individual benefit increases with increasing community mask use. Further research is needed to expand the evidence base for the protective effect of cloth masks and in particular to identify the combinations of materials that maximize both their blocking and filtering effectiveness, as well as fit, comfort, durability, and consumer appeal. Adopting universal masking policies can help avert future lockdowns, especially if combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing, hand hygiene, and adequate ventilation. [emphasis added]

2020 Election misinformation and disinformation continued…

In a follow-up to warnings about election misinformation and disinformation in Michigan, we are now experiencing both as Michigan’s vote count comes to an end. 

Manufactured Outrage - Biden is not magically finding votes

One of the latest reports of manufactured outrage, turns out to have been promulgated on Twitter by the chair of Texas' Travis County Republican Party Matt Mackowiak [see “No, Joe Biden did not magically 'find' votes in Michigan” by Clara Hendrickson and Kristi Tanner from the Detroit Free Press, 11/4/2020]

From the Detroit Free Press:

“A since deleted tweet posted by Matt Mackowiak, a conservative commentator and chair of Texas' Travis County Republican Party, appears to show that during one results update in Michigan, Joe Biden received 100% of newly counted votes. Attached to the tweet were two election maps appearing to show election results from earlier in the count and one from later. Mackowiak said he took the screenshots early this morning. Mackowiak acknowledged the posts were inaccurate. He has since deleted the tweet, explaining, 'I have now learned the MI update referenced was a typo in one county.'"

Giving credit where it is due, the Texas official deleted his tweet when he learned that it was based on a quickly corrected clerical error, but not before President Trump retweeted the misinformation to his millions of followers.

The maps shared by Mackowiak came from Decision Desk HQ, an election data company. The data company corrected a tweet posted with the false information and explained the mistake:  

"'This morning there was a clerical error in the Shiawassee, MI county presidential data.' The company explained, 'Once we identified the error, we cleared the erroneous data and updated it with the correct data as provided by officials. We stand by our data as reflected on results.decisiondeskhq.com.'"

Also from the article, “An hour-by-hour update from Associated Press data shows that there was no point in time when Trump did not post an increase in votes.” 

Chaos at the TCF vote counting center in Detroit

In another account of election confusion, “Chaos erupts at TCF Center as Republican vote challengers cry foul in Detroit” by Tresa Baldas, Kristen Jordan Shamus, Niraj Warikoo, and Evan Petzold,  from the Detroit Free Press,11/04/2020:

“A chaotic scene erupted outside the vote tally room at TCF Center in Detroit on Wednesday as election officials informed dozens of challengers that they could not reenter the room due to it being at capacity.  

“People gathered outside the ballot-counting area pounded on the doors and windows, shouting, “Let us in” and “Stop the count” as only about a half-dozen tables continued to count ballots on the day after Election Day.

“Police had to push back the crowds as they argued to be allowed in the vote-counting area. Republican counters shouted that they were unfairly being kept out, but Democratic challengers countered that it was not true because they were also being kept outside.”

The situation was exacerbated by Covid restrictions on the number of people who could be in the counting center at one time. Officials were letting 134 people from each of three groups contesting the vote, Republicans, Democrats, and non-partisan challengers. “But early on Wednesday, about 400 challengers were freely roaming the room as poll workers counted the 25,000 absentee ballots from Detroiters.” 

Vote counters were concerned about intimidation with people taking pictures of them and the counting process. Some of the challengers were falsely telling vote counters they had to stop counting because a lawsuit had been filed by the Republicans, but there had been no injunction to stop counting nor was there any reason to believe that the counters were engaged in voter or election fraud.

“Several lawyers asserted that the trouble started when GOP challengers tried to intimidate poll workers. And they were removed because they either took their masks off, got too close to the poll counters, tried to take pictures or got verbally aggressive.”

The confusion created by swarms of people descending on the TCF Center in Detroit during the counting of votes makes it difficult to sort out exactly what was happening and to whom. But anyone claiming to see a conspiracy in all this for massive voter or election fraud should have to watch the video below of the Livonia, Michigan, City Clerk Susan Nash as she demonstrates what happens when mailed absentee ballots arrive at city hall.

In my experience, local election officials in Michigan who are in charge of guarding against voter and election fraud are the nerdiest of upright citizens, determined to follow the rules in a fair, balanced, and transparent process that should be reassuring to the rest of us that the processing of absentee or mail-in ballots is in good hands.

Be prepared for election misinformation and disinformation

Gird yourselves for the coming onslaught of misinformation and disinformation between now, the day before the 2020 election ends, and the final results come in. It is possible that if there are legal challenges to election results, the surge of false reports, lies, and misleading images will continue. 

An article in the Detroit Free Press, "Heads up, Michigan. Here's what disinformation experts are watching for on Election Day" by Ashley Nerbovig, 11/02/20,  covers the kinds of misinformation and disinformation you may be subjected to: 

"Given attempts like these [photos and videos of long lines at polling places, stories declaring unofficial winners, and claims of voter fraud] to mislead or deter voters ahead of the election and the possibility that no presidential race winner will be declared on Election Day, researchers and experts on disinformation advise Michiganders to be extra careful about where their information comes from in the next few weeks.

"Misinformation is false information shared by accident or without the knowledge it is false. Disinformation is when someone deliberately creates or shares information that is incorrect to inflict damage, such as telling people the wrong date of the election. Learning what this can look like can slow the spread of false information."

According to the article, researchers with the University of Washington's Election Integrity Project created a list of what to expect in coming weeks:

• Uncertainty, anxiety and the potential that red-to-blue or blue-to-red shifts will create opportunities to delegitimize the election results. 
• Efforts to deter voting with images and videos of long lines, COVID-19 dangers and protests.   
• Voting process problems that may be strategically framed and overemphasized to fit misleading narratives.  
• Claims of disenfranchisement will be highlighted and there may be false evidence and narratives of voter fraud.
• Social media companies that take action to address election-related misinformation will be accused of censorship. 
• Lost or found post-election ballots will be politicized.
• Allegations of foreign interference will be made.  

"To slow the spread of false information, avoid sharing early results from candidates or armchair data scientists. "

This all sounds like good advice to me. Stay calm and consult trusted sources of information. 

***********************

See also, "Know your voting rights..." by Josh Peter, USA Today, 10/28/20

Wear a mask for Halloween with spooky music

High speed camera captures how different types of face masks work

"Which mask works best? To visualise droplets and aerosols, UNSW researchers used LED lighting system & a high-speed camera, filming people coughing and sneezing in different scenarios — using no mask, 2 different types of cloth masks, and a surgical mask..." (see more)"

See also, "Scientific Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2" from the Centers for Disease Control, 11/10/20.

 

Michigan partial news roundup for October 30, 2020

I love newspapers. A print newspaper is best, but I can tolerate reading a daily paper that is on-line when it looks like the real thing and is not just columns of articles that you have to link to and hope you didn’t miss anything interesting. 

I enjoy the randomness of coming across stories like this one -“Traffic-stopping turkey becoming social media star” on page 2A of today’s Detroit Free Press or “Feds remove protections for wolves; U.P. hunt on?” on page 4A. Will Michigan reinstate a wolf hunting season in the Upper Peninsula? Are cats and dogs next???

The following articles are a sampling of stories that caught my eye. I have provided links to the on-line versions of these articles, so that you don’t have to go out and buy an actual print newspaper.

From the Detroit Free Press, October 30, 2020:

“Michigan sets new restrictions on dining, gatherings as COVID-19 cases rise”  by Dave Boucher and Kristen Jordan Shamus

Here is a little background to this story: The Michigan Supreme Court, on 10/2/20, struck down the 1945 Emergency Powers of Governor Act that the Governor used as her authority to issue directives during the COVID-19 pandemic. The ruling, however, did not affect other laws relating to public health. Most of the Governor's directives have been re-issued by the head of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. 

There are other issues, such as extending unemployment benefits, that have been approved by the legislature and replace similar directives previously issued by Governor Whitmer.

Local public health authorities have issued orders that continue those previously ordered by the state. Local businesses and public agencies are also allowed to make rules to preserve health and safety.

Michigan is now experiencing a severe spike in Covid-19 cases. According to the article,

“Cases throughout the state are up almost 94% in the last 14 days, according to data accumulated by the New York Times. As of Wednesday, the seven-day average number of positive cases was 2,365. At its peak in March, the seven-day average never topped 1,800 cases, according to data analyzed by the Free Press.

“Hospitalizations and deaths are also on the rise. More than 500 Michiganders have died from COVID-19 in October, compared with less than 300 in September. Michigan saw more deaths this month than any since May, according to state health data. “

More stringent restrictions have been ordered:

"The regulations include new restrictions on the number of people who may dine together at a bar or restaurant and establish requirements for eateries to keep contact information for dine-in customers.

"The order, issued by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, is intended to mandate mask wearing while in public, limit crowd sizes at private gatherings and in business, and generally promote actions that will stop the spread of the disease. 

"The order does not apply to polling places or anywhere else that someone may try to cast a vote. Masks are recommended but not required for people who choose to cast a ballot in person on Tuesday, when polls open at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. “

“Michigan Court of Appeals denies Benson appeal, says open carry at polls is legal”, by Paul Egan, 10/29/20. 

The Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson issued a directive to ban the open carry of firearms at the polls. 

You may remember pictures from April 2020 of armed men in the state capitol building in Lansing screaming at security guards during demonstrations demanding an end to restrictions to control the spread of Covid-19. Armed men were also allowed to stand in the gallery over the heads of the legislators while the legislature was in session. One legislator had the foresight to wear her bullet proof vest, just in case the situation turned really ugly. At least one of the armed men photographed in the gallery was later arrested in a plot to kidnap and kill Governor Whitmer. 

This was all legal under MIchigan's open carry law, although restrictions are allowed in public areas under certain circumstances. Action by the state legislature to restrict the open carry of firearms might have stopped this threatening behavior in the state capitol. 

Needless to say, tensions are high and Benson’s directive makes sense to prevent threats of violence at the polls. Her orders were overturned in court, however. Then the Michigan Court of Appeals denied Benson’s appeal of the ruling.

According to the article,

"The open carry of firearms will be permitted at the polls on Election Day, under an order issued Thursday by the Michigan Court of Appeals... "

"...In declining to hear the appeal, the panel said that although concerns about voter intimidation involving firearms are valid, the state already has laws to handle that.'Voter intimidation is — and remains — illegal under current Michigan law,' the panel said.

"Also, 'brandishing a firearm in public is — and remains — illegal under current Michigan law.' Therefore, 'anyone who intimidates a voter in Michigan by brandishing a firearm ... is committing a felony under existing law, and that law is — and remains —enforceable by our executive branch as well as local law enforcement.'"

In addition,

"'Just today, a poll released by the Detroit News and WDIV-TV indicated that 73% of Michigan voters say openly carried guns should be banned near polling places,' Nessel spokesman Ryanend nu Jarvi said. 'The merits of this issue — which impacts all Michiganders — deserves full and expedited consideration by our state’s highest court.'...

“Though Benson's directive remains without force under the Thursday order, existing state law could still prohibit some Michiganders from openly carrying firearms at some polling places. Schools are often used as polling places and guns are generally prohibited on school grounds, though concealed pistol license holders are allowed to open carry on school property.”

Here’s some good news:

"Surprise out-of-network medical bills now illegal in Michigan" by JC Reindl

“When receiving successful treatment to prevent preterm labor, Stacy Leick of White Lake Township underwent a 3D baby ultrasound at a hospital that was in-network with her health insurance company. 

"Three months later and back home with her new baby girl, she received an unpleasant surprise in the mail: a $750 medical bill.

"Unknown to her, the radiologist who may have read the ultrasound was a visiting doctor and therefore not in her insurance company's network — so her insurer wouldn't pay his full charges.. The doctor's billing company then went after her for the unpaid balance.”

…"That sort of surprise should no longer happen in Michigan because of new legislation signed into law last week by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer after it passed through the state Legislature by wide bipartisan margins.

"The laws forbid medical providers from sending big surprise bills to patients who received emergency care outside of their insurance network, a practice known as balance billing."

Here is a link from the Detroit Free Press to a USA Today article on voting rights, just in time for the November 3rd, 2020 election:

"Know your voting rights: Here's what to do if you encounter intimidation at the polls on Election Day" by Josh Peter, USA Today, 10/28/20

This article covers the basics:

• The right to vote free of intimidation
• The right to vote by provisional ballot if your name is not on the list of registered voters
  
• The right to vote with accommodations
  
• The right to vote after the polls close 
• The right to re-vote

Michigan Voters: It's not too late to register to vote and to vote with an absentee ballot

Do you know that there are people who don't want you to vote? Voter suppression efforts have been ramped up across the country. Michigan is a swing state and is getting special attention by those who are afraid you might cast your ballot for the wrong person or vote on some issue that goes against their wishes. That makes this election crucial.

This is from the Michigan Secretary of State's Office:

 

October 19, 2020, was the last day to register to vote online for the November 3, 2020, election.

 

“…If someone has not yet registered after this deadline has passed, they may still register in person at their city or township clerk’s office through Election Day with a document verifying their residency. They can also apply for and return an absent voter ballot [there] at the clerk’s office in the same trip.”

“Voters who are already registered can vote early at their clerk’s office now and through the day before the election. On Election Day, already registered voters must vote at their local polling place. Clerk and polling place information is available at Michigan.gov/Vote.”

"Voters who already have their ballots are encouraged to return them as soon as possible — by mail NO LATER than Oct.19, or by hand delivering to their clerk’s office or ballot drop box. Ballot drop box locations for individual jurisdictions can be found at Michigan.gov/Vote. All absentee ballot return envelopes must be signed by the voter to be counted."

"...After...Oct. 19,2020, the online registration portal at Michigan.gov/Vote will include several warnings that voters must register in person to vote by or on Nov. 3, with instructions on how to do so."

YOUR VOTER INFORMATION 

Where are my clerk’s offices?
Where are my ballot drop boxes?
Where is my polling place?
Am I registered?
What's on the ballot?

Now Vote.

************************* 

from The DD News Blog 2012:

Make it stop!

Death by Severe Autism

"Death by Severe Autism" is an article from the National Council on Severe Autism by Lee Wachtel, MD, a pediatric neuropsychiatrist and the Medical Director of the Neurobehavioral Unit at the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore, Maryland. The Kennedy Krieger Institute is an inpatient unit serving youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities and severe behavioral and psychiatric disturbance. She is also an Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. 

***************************************

Death by Severe Autism  

October 19, 2020

In the wake of senseless tragedy, a psychiatrist reflects 

on severe autism’s painful realities.

By Lee E. Wachtel, MD

With the presidential election only two weeks away, our country stands at a tremendous crossroads during an era of unprecedented health and social challenge. Our lives literally seem at stake. As Republicans and Democrats spar on hotly contested issues ranging from Covid-19 to racial and social equity, climate change and the Supreme Court, disability activists are also jockeying for power and planning their next steps in whatever administration the American people elect.  

I had been quite excited to participate in some of these political advocacy initiatives, until I was upbraided and accused of “ableism” and hurting others’ feelings when I asked what plans might include those with severe autism and intellectual disability. I was informed that “severe” was an unacceptable term, and as discussion of this topic was deeply upsetting to some individuals, I would be dismissed from the committee if I mentioned it again.

Let's be clear. There is obviously, without any doubt, such a thing as severe autism. The tragic death of autism advocate Feda Almaliti and her autistic 15-year-old son Muhammed (often called “Mu” or “Hammoudeh”) in a house fire in the early hours of September 26 underscores this reality, and also just how critical it is to never back down. We must never allow the plight of children and families dealing with severe autism to be suppressed by advocates who actively seek to downplay the serious mental challenges that ended up killing both Mu and his mother.

 

Feda, her sister Maysoon and Maysoon's daughter safely exited the burning home, but Feda ran back inside and upstairs to save Mu. Maysoon described what happened next:

“I ran back to the front door to scream for Feda again- as if that would help her come down faster. I can hear the popping of glass and the faint noises of Hammoudeh crying, “No, No, No" in response to Feda pleading with him. ‘HAMMOUDEH COME ON WE HAVE TO GO, NOW, WE HAVE TO GET OUT NOW!’

“The crying and screaming start to fade, probably not lasting more than thirty seconds. Then it stops and all I can hear is myself screaming for Feda and the words ‘my family.’ The realization of how useless and helpless I became made me sick and I wondered if my heart would give out any second.”

In other words, Feda ran back into the burning two-story structure to coax her 6’2”, 280-pound autistic son out of his room and down the stairs. But he would not budge, and Feda stayed. When the fire officials found the bodies, Feda was embracing Mu.

After a colleague and autism parent commented that “Autism killed Feda and Mu,” I had the chilling recognition that these two incredible people died a horrific death precisely because a severely autistic and intellectually disabled kid was unable to transition from point A to point B. 

I’ve worked with autistic youth for nearly two decades and have seen countless behavioral protocols developed with intricate layers of reinforcement to gain compliance with necessary daily transitions. Yet while I’ve had kids plop down in the road or tantrum naked in busy airport hallways, I’ve never had any autistic child suffocate and burn for failure to move.

Typical teens in this crisis would have immediately run down the stairs. Indeed, most people with autism would have done so as well. The autism and disability advocates who attend college and graduate school, tweet their condemnations of autism parents, and campaign for policy reform and who are largely capable of high levels of independent stewardship, would have not hesitated. And those with physical handicap without severe mental and intellectual disability would have grasped the urgency of the situation and likely followed a planned and practiced exit strategy.

Feda Almaliti was an autism trailblazer beyond compare, and her autistic son Mu was cherished for his infectious joy. But by any reasonable measure, his autism was completely unlike that of the autism self-advocates. It was severe – Feda herself described him as “Autistic as F&@#” — and was compounded by severe intellectual disability. Most importantly, in a dire situation his severe impairments rendered him incapable of taking a simple action to save his own life. If Mu had mild autism, and lesser intellectual disability, I have no doubt he would have heeded his mother's words and fled the fire. Mild and severe. More and fewer IQ points. It all matters. It matters so much that in this case it meant the difference between life and death.

My one hope is that this tragedy may actually serve as a lesson to disability activists who dismiss the reality and plight of the severely disabled while narrow-mindedly pursuing their own agendas. There are so many Mus and Fedas out there facing horrendous hardships. Dismissing their realities — as I was essentially asked to do by current disability leaders — would not only have been a grave violation of the medical ethics to which I adhere, it would carry potentially devastating consequences for national disability programs and policy.

Whichever administration is in power after the election, they need to hear about severe autism. They need to hear about it loud and clear. Lives are on the line.

Preventing the spread of COVID-19 during colder weather

An article from USA Today has some good advice about staying safe indoors as Covid cases are rising in most parts of the country: “Fauci warns against Thanksgiving celebrations: How to stay safe indoors from the coronavirus during cold seasons” by Adrianna Rodriguez, 10/16/20.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has become a target for people who irrationally blame Covid and the fallout from the virus on him as the bearer of news that they do not want to hear. In his defense, Dr. Fauci is not banning Thanksgiving. He is just warning that gatherings of people at events like this can turn into tragic super spreaders of the virus. Read the full artlcle for specifics on how to function safely in indoor environments. Here are some excerpts:

“Officials have been able to control COVID-19 transmission rates by implementing policies that encourage residents to eat and drink, exercise and spend time with friends and loved ones at a safe distance outside. 

“But health experts are concerned cases could spike again as cooler temperatures in the fall and winter force people back indoors. 

“The nation's leading infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, also is concerned upcoming holiday celebrations could increase transmission rates and advised Americans to skip any big Thanksgiving plans. 

“Speaking to 'CBS Evening News' Wednesday, Fauci cautioned against 'gathering together in an indoor setting' with large groups of out-of-town guests. 'It is unfortunate because that’s such a sacred part of American tradition – the family gathering around Thanksgiving,' he said. 'But that is a risk.'“ 

The article goes on to explain how improving ventilation indoors, prevents transmission of the virus:

“Dr. Lewis Nelson, professor and chair of emergency medicine at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, said one of the main reasons there’s a higher risk of transmission indoors than outdoors is lack of ventilation.

“'Natural air currents outside disperse virus particles more quickly and effectively than inside. There’s minimal to no air circulation indoors, allowing virus particles to linger in the air or fall on high-touch surfaces.'…

[See more on this subject: "Ventilation and air filtration play a key role in preventing the spread of COVID-19 indoors" by Ramon Padilla, USA TODAY, 10/19/20]

The article also encourages the continued use of masks and social distancing and emphasizes keeping an eye on community transmission rates:

“Although mask-wearing, social distancing, hand hygiene and increased airflow can reduce the risk of transmission indoors, these mitigation efforts aren't 100% effective, especially if community transmission rates are high.

“Barry Bloom, research professor of public health and former dean of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, recommends residents keep an eye on transmission rates in their area to determine if it’s safe to go to an indoor public setting.”

In general, the recommendations for preventing spread of the virus remain the same, whether indoors or outside in public spaces and for the same reasons. The Covid-19 virus is very contagious and is spread from one person to another, mostly through the air in droplets and aerosols that contain the virus. The droplets and aerosols are expelled by a contagious person during breathing, talking, singing, exercising, and other activities. 

The likelihood of contracting the virus increases with the amount of virus one is exposed to over time. Without a cure for the disease or the availability of vaccines, preventing the spread of the virus relies on some standard public health measures such as quarantining people who are known to be infected, wearing masks, physical distancing, and improving ventilation to lower the concentration of the virus to safer levels. Frequent hand-washing takes care of virus that may be picked up from contaminated surfaces and transferred to ones nose, mouth, or eyes. 

From what I understand, when the virus lodges deep in the lungs, it replicates and spreads infection to the rest of the body. An infected person may have no symptoms at all or their symptoms may be catastrophic. Short of death, survivors of the virus can have severe damage to organs and in some people it appears to be a chronic disease, but it is too soon to know exactly what the long term effects are from contracting the virus.

Masks have been as much maligned as Dr. Fauci. Depending on the mask, even a homemade two-layered cloth mask is a good barrier to spreading the virus. It does not filter out separate virus particles, but it does prevent the transmission of droplets, which is where the virus lurks in most instances. The primary purpose of wearing a mask is to protect others if you happen to be contagious and don’t know it. It may also help the wearer of the mask by stopping droplets from a contagious person, but this is not the primary purpose for wearing a mask.

While masks are not recommended for very young children or for people like my disabled sons who cannot remove the mask themselves, they can be worn safely by most people. My boys have worn masks to medical appointments, but they are always with a caregiver who would recognize if a mask was causing them distress.

Contrary to reports from people opposing mask mandates, masks have not been found to lower oxygen levels or raise CO2 levels. See “Fact check: Experts say face masks don't cause oxygen deprivation, neurological damage” by Devan Patel, USATODAY, 10/17/20: 

“‘While masks can block particles like respiratory droplets and aerosols that might contain coronavirus, they do not block gases like oxygen and carbon dioxide,’ said Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech and an expert in airborne disease transmission. ‘A recent study of people wearing surgical masks while walking around found no significant changes in carbon dioxide in their breath nor oxygen in their blood, compared to walking without a mask.’”

The article concludes,

“Though the neurological damage described can occur when there is oxygen deprivation, medical experts say there is no evidence linking either to wearing masks.

“Medical studies have shown a link between COVID-19 and those very neurological effects, meaning the decision to not to wear a mask puts people at a higher risk of experiencing them.”

So what are the arguments against wearing a mask? This is a YouTube video of citizen anti-mask activists from Palm Beach County, Florida, on June 26, 2020. I find their arguments bizarre and not helpful in getting to any understanding of why mask wearing may be harmful or unwarranted, other than they just don't like being told what to do: Mask wearing is "against God’s will”, they say, and it is “practicing the devil’s law”; requiring masks is a crime against humanity; social distancing trains us up to follow military protocol; it’s all Bill Gates’ fault and 5G has something to do with it; and surely satanism, pedophilia, and death will follow mandates for the wearing of masks. 

Wearing a mask in public spaces to prevent the spread of a contagious virus does not infringe on anyone’s liberty any more than following laws that require us to stop at red lights or to wear shoes in restaurants. It is in fact an easy and inexpensive way to slow the spread to get the virus under control so that the economy can recover. This happened in Arizona when the state took measures to stop the spread of the virus:

"COVID-19 cases in Arizona dropped 75% after mask mandates began, report says" by Stephanie Innes, Arizona Republic,10/9/20. 

I don’t like wearing a mask for long periods of time, but I owe it to the people who have to work in places where they come in frequent contact with the public, including grocery store clerks, the pharmacist where I pick up my medications, medical workers who take care of my son Danny when he lands in the ER for uncontrolled seizures, and many more. For people who cannot tolerate a mask for whatever reason, there are many alternatives to buying essential items that don’t involve in-person shopping. Even church services have been modified to ensure social distancing and safety. 

Getting control of Covid-19 has dragged on for far too long. When it appears that there is no end in sight, the danger is in giving up and giving in to a wildly out of control pandemic. We deserve better than that and the control of the virus is still within our grasp while we wait for vaccines, better treatments, and cures.